Comparison

Secure Share vs Privnote

Privnote popularized self-destructing notes, but its security model has significant gaps. Here's how Secure Share compares for teams that care about real encryption.

TL;DR

Choose Secure Share if you need:

  • True zero-knowledge encryption (key never reaches the server)
  • Passphrase protection with PBKDF2 key derivation
  • Bot protection — Slack/Teams/Discord won't burn your links
  • Configurable expiry (30 min to 7 days)
  • Clean interface without third-party ad network trackers

Choose Privnote if you need:

  • Email notifications when a note is read
  • Custom destruction notices for recipients
  • The simplest possible interface (no options)

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

FeatureSecure SharePrivnoteNotes
Self-Destructing MessagesBoth destroy after first read
AES-256-GCM EncryptionPrivnote's encryption method is not publicly documented
Zero-Knowledge ArchitectureSecure Share encrypts in-browser; Privnote encrypts server-side
Passphrase ProtectionPrivnote has no passphrase option
Configurable TTLPrivnote does not offer TTL configuration
Bot / Link Preview ProtectionPrivnote links can be burned by Slack/Teams preview bots
No Account RequiredBoth work without sign-up
Generous Free TierBoth offer free usage; Secure Share has a generous free tier
No Third-Party Ad NetworksPrivnote serves third-party ad network scripts; Secure Share does not
Read ConfirmationPrivnote can email you when a note is read
Custom Destruction NoticePrivnote allows a custom "note destroyed" message

Security: Why It Matters

Secure Share — Browser-Side Encryption

Your message is encrypted using the Web Crypto API (AES-256-GCM) before it ever leaves your browser. The encryption key lives in the URL fragment (#), which is never transmitted to servers per the HTTP specification.

Result: even Secure Share's operators cannot read your messages.

Privnote — Server-Side Processing

Privnote's encryption model is not publicly documented. The message is sent to Privnote's servers, where it is processed and stored. There is no documented evidence of client-side encryption, meaning the server has access to your plaintext.

Additionally, Privnote serves third-party ads, which introduces additional tracking and potential security vectors.

The Bot Problem

Secure Share — Protected

When you share a Secure Share link in Slack, Teams, or Discord, those platforms send bots to preview the URL. Secure Share requires a manual clickbefore decrypting, so bots can't accidentally burn your message.

Privnote — Vulnerable

Privnote links can be consumed by link-preview bots. If you paste a Privnote link into Slack, the bot may open it and destroy the note before the intended recipient ever sees it.

This is a well-documented issue with no built-in mitigation.

Verify Our Claims

Open Source Security

Don't take our word for it. Our encryption source code, database schema, and threat model are published on GitHub for anyone to audit. You can verify that the key never leaves your browser and that our server stores only ciphertext it cannot decrypt.

Read the Security Architecture →

Upgrade from Privnote today

Real encryption. No third-party ad trackers. No sign-up. Just security.

Try Secure Share →